Reddit AI Coding - 2026-04-16¶
1. What People Are Talking About¶
1.1 Opus 4.7 Launches to Immediate Cynicism and Reasoning Failures (🡕)¶
Claude Opus 4.7 launched on April 16, dominating all seven monitored subreddits with at least 15 dedicated threads. u/ClaudeOfficial posted the official announcement (968 score, 379 comments): better complex programming, 3x higher-resolution vision, same API pricing at $5/$25 per million tokens, and cyber safeguards from Project Glasswing (Introducing Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable Opus model yet). The top community response, u/Ok-Actuary7793 (619 upvotes): "Buckle up boys, we're getting 3 days of next-gen model before lobotomy again."
The day's highest-scoring post (1746 score, 275 comments) was u/Dramatic_Method_9554's screenshot of Opus 4.7 failing the "car wash test" — asked whether to walk or drive 50 meters to a car wash, it answered "Walk... driving a car you're about to wash makes no sense" (Opus 4.7). Multiple users reproduced the reasoning failure. u/Kaelthas98 (139 upvotes) posted a screenshot showing Haiku 4.5 answering correctly: "Haiku 4.5 was the real AGI all along."
Before the official announcement, u/No-Macaron9305 caught the model appearing early — a screenshot showed the Opus 4.6 selector returning model slug claude-opus-4-7 (1015 score, 137 comments). u/Healthy_Razzmatazz38 (319 upvotes): "suddenly all my co workers are about to get a few percent smarter" (So it begins).
The cynicism crystallized in u/anthsoul's post (505 score, 29 comments) sharing a tweet from @hetmehtaa: "Give people Opus 4.6 > People love it > For 2 months you degrade Opus 4.6 > You give back normal Opus 4.6 and call it Opus 4.7 > People love it. That's the business model" (Be Anthropic). u/workphone6969 stated it directly: "Opus 4.7 = Un-nerfed Opus 4.6" (107 score) (Opus 4.7 = Un-nerfed Opus 4.6).
Within hours, u/Harvard_Med_USMLE267 posted "Opus 4.7 nerfed?" (134 score, 39 comments): "99% sure Anthropic has started running a 2-bit quant to save money... subscription cancelled" (Opus 4.7 nerfed?). u/BeautifulLullaby2: "Burned through my limits in like 20 minutes on Claude Max x5, completely dumb and lost on my current project, going back to Opus 4.6" (44 score) (Opus 4.7 is unusable).
Discussion insight: The nerf-then-rebrand narrative is now the default lens through which every Anthropic model release is evaluated. Even positive early reviews are framed as temporary — "get your hard work in now before it degrades in 2 months" (u/TriggerHydrant, 101 upvotes). Anthropic's official benchmarks are treated as irrelevant compared to the "car wash test" meme, which became the community's de facto evaluation.
Comparison to prior day: April 15 reported Opus 4.7 as imminent based on leaked codenames (Capybara, Tengu). April 16 delivers the actual release, instant community backlash, and the first "already nerfed" reports within hours — compressing the full hype-to-disappointment cycle into a single day.
1.2 Opus 4.7 Pricing Shock on GitHub Copilot (🡕)¶
GitHub announced Opus 4.7 availability in Copilot with a 7.5x premium request multiplier — and Opus 4.5 and 4.6 are being phased out. u/baeleeef shared the changelog (139 score, 210 comments). u/nvez (160 upvotes): "Why would it be 7.5x (for promotional period too... so it'll be more?) and it'll replace 4.5 and 4.6? That seems like a massive price hike... especially when the pricing on the Anthropic side hasn't changed" (Claude Opus 4.7 is available in Copilot with a 7.5x premium request multiplier).
u/Devile (79 upvotes): "First rate limits, then weekly rate limits, now deprecation of the most used model (x3) and be replaced with a x7.5 successor. I am pissed." u/Famous__Draw (57 upvotes): "still stuck with a 200k context window despite the 7.5x." u/DillyMing added that Copilot caps the model at 160K context with locked medium thinking budget (64 score) (Copilot Claude Opus 4.7 is 7.5x).
On Cursor, u/AdAutomatic1446 reported Opus 4.7 launching at 50% off but forced into Max mode (59 score, 31 comments). u/FallopianInvestor (8 upvotes): "Asked a single question and it used like 40 tokens, it didn't even code. Max mode forced" (Opus 4.7 just launched on Cursor).
Discussion insight: The forced deprecation of Opus 4.6 combined with a 2.5x multiplier increase (from 3x to 7.5x) is being read as an effective price hike disguised as an upgrade. Users who relied on Opus 4.6 at 3x cost now face 7.5x or must move to a different model entirely.
Comparison to prior day: April 15 tracked rate limiting as an industry condition. April 16 adds a structural pricing change on Copilot that compounds the rate-limit frustration — users who haven't hit limits yet will now burn through quotas 2.5x faster per Opus request.
1.3 Rate Limiting and Outages Persist Across All Platforms (🡒)¶
API 500 errors continued on April 16 with at least five distinct threads. u/barack17 confirmed morning 500s while the status page showed operational (95 score, 100 comments) (Claude code down?). u/dennisplucinik timed the acknowledgment at under 5 minutes, with service restored by 11:03 AM EST (90 score, 73 comments) (Getting "API Error: 500" errors again this morning). u/marciuz777 posted the Anthropic status page showing consumer services in "Degraded Performance": claude.ai at 97.95%, Claude Code at 98.41%, Claude API at 98.65% — while Claude for Government held at 99.96% (258 score, 70 comments) (Notice anything).
Boris Cherny announced on Twitter that rate limits were increased for all subscribers to compensate for Opus 4.7's higher thinking token usage (220 score, 67 comments). u/anthsoul (155 upvotes): "They break your leg and then ask you to thank them for the crutches." u/rJohn420 tested it on Max x5 and saw only 10% extra capacity (increased rate limits).
On Copilot, u/Maverobot documented being rate limited after a single prompt on Pro+ even after an overnight cooldown (54 score, 64 comments). u/KayBay80 (26 upvotes): "our entire team is hitting these limits... only solution we've come up with is multiple accounts to let the others cool down" (Copilot Pro+ is a joke). u/flipperj_3000 canceled Pro+ after 8 months: "for a simple 2000 line code review I get rate limited" (34 score, 50 comments) (Weekly limit made me quit).
Google Antigravity's outage continued with u/Black_Star_1 asking "Is Google giving up on Antigravity?" (71 score, 63 comments) (Is Google giving up on Antigravity?). u/LawfulnessLocal4934 reported a "Huge Silent Outage for Ultra plan Users" (29 score, 36 comments) (Huge Silent Outage).
Comparison to prior day: April 15 documented two outage waves. April 16 shows continued sub-98.5% consumer uptime and a new dynamic: the Opus 4.7 launch amplified both server load and token consumption, making outages and rate limits functionally indistinguishable.
1.4 Identity Verification Backlash Escalates (🡕)¶
Anthropic's requirement for government IDs and face scans via Persona Identities generated the day's highest comment count. u/Wa1ker1 started the primary thread (178 score, 200 comments) (Anthropic to require government IDs and face scans for users). u/BroadEstate9711 (178 upvotes): "Cannot wait till we have capable off-line LLMs that doesn't cost a fortune to run." u/Red0Adrenaline (104 upvotes): "That's the line for me. Cancelling as soon as this becomes a thing."
u/Direct-Attention8597 posted a detailed analysis (177 score, 95 comments) noting that Persona had a documented data breach in late 2025 exposing ~70,000 government ID images from Discord users, and that Persona may share data with up to 17 sub-processors. u/ProperArticle5003 (113 upvotes): "Persona is not a trusted party." u/orphenshadow (78 upvotes): "a line in the sand for me" (Anthropic just quietly launched ID verification for Claude).
u/nobodyhere3369 specifically flagged the Peter Thiel connection (135 score, 33 comments). u/Wanky_Danky_Pae (65 upvotes) drew the sharpest contrast: "Anthropic Feb 2026: 'We don't want our stuff used to spy on Americans.' Anthropic April 2026: 'We are glad to partner with a data leaking company to spy on Americans.'"
Discussion insight: The identity verification backlash is distinct from rate limiting and outage complaints — it is a values-level objection. Users who tolerated service degradation are drawing a hard line at biometric data collection, especially given Persona's breach history and Anthropic's previous positioning as the "responsible" AI company.
Comparison to prior day: April 15 surfaced the ID verification requirement with moderate engagement. April 16 sees three separate high-engagement threads (200, 95, 33 comments) and explicit cancellation threats — the issue is accelerating.
1.5 Output Token Inflation Documented With Reproducible Evidence (🡕)¶
u/bitdamaged published the most rigorous technical investigation of the day: a controlled A/B test across Claude Code versions 2.1.96 through 2.1.107 showing output tokens per assistant message jumped from 791 (2.1.96) to 1,622 (2.1.98, +105%) to 2,221 (2.1.101, +181%) — same prompt, same model, same machine (44 score, 29 comments). The full reproducer is filed as GitHub issue #48808 with session JSONLs and analysis scripts (As of 2.1.101 Output Tokens increased by 3x).
Separately, u/Dyrect_ posted a side-by-side comparison: Opus 4.6 consumed ~270K tokens to complete 6/19 tasks, while Opus 4.5 used 140K tokens to complete an entire plan of comparable complexity (42 score, 38 comments). "My old coding buddy is back" (use opus 4.5--just try it).
u/dinkinflika0 added another angle: "Claude Code v2.1.100 is injecting ~20K invisible tokens per request and your proxy logs can prove it" (36 score) (Claude Code v2.1.100 is injecting ~20K invisible tokens).
Comparison to prior day: April 15 documented the cache TTL fix and token consumption concerns qualitatively. April 16 provides the first reproducible, version-pinned quantitative evidence of a 2-3x output token increase across Claude Code versions.
1.6 CLAUDE.md vs AGENTS.md Configuration Debate (🡒)¶
u/onil_gova posted a screenshot of a CLAUDE.md file containing a single line — "read AGENTS.md" — that became one of the day's most engaged threads (636 score, 84 comments) (How to properly deal with a CLAUDE.md file).
Three approaches emerged: u/andreagrandi (128 upvotes): "just create a symlink! ln -s AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md." u/spinnakerflying (26 upvotes) prefers the @AGENTS.md include directive for team portability: "I believe it is a programmatic inclusion so tokens aren't burned redirecting." u/ThePantsThief (16 upvotes): "Why can't they just make Claude auto pickup AGENTS.md by now."
Comparison to prior day: April 15 covered CLAUDE.md structuring methodology (keep it under 40 lines, use scoped rules). April 16 shifts to the interop problem: how to maintain a single source of truth when multiple agents (Claude, Copilot, Codex) each expect their own configuration file.
2. What Frustrates People¶
Opus 4.7 Token Consumption and Quality Uncertainty -- High Severity¶
Opus 4.7 consumes 1.0-1.35x more tokens per input according to Anthropic's own documentation, and users report even higher ratios in practice. u/Logichris (200 upvotes): "we will reach our session limits in 3 prompts instead of 4." u/BeautifulLullaby2 burned through Max x5 limits in 20 minutes. u/Frankkul documented day-to-day quality swings: "Had yesterday the old Opus back for one day... Today it is back to be a village idiot" (45 score, 35 comments) (Opus quality changes by day). The "increased rate limits" announced by Boris Cherny were tested by u/rJohn420 and found to be only ~10% extra on Max x5 (increased rate limits).
Copilot Opus 4.7 Multiplier as Effective Price Hike -- High Severity¶
The 7.5x premium request multiplier on Copilot — with Opus 4.5 and 4.6 being phased out — removes users' ability to choose a cheaper model. u/shminglefarm22 (62 upvotes): "What a fucking scam. At least keep 4.6." u/Kaljuuntuva_Teppo (30 upvotes): "Guess I'll keep using GPT-5.4 xhigh." The API pricing is unchanged ($5/$25), making the 7.5x Copilot multiplier appear to be a Microsoft margin decision rather than a cost reflection (Claude Opus 4.7 is available in Copilot).
Identity Verification Trust Breach -- High Severity¶
Three threads totaling 328 comments show the Persona Identities requirement is generating explicit cancellation threats. The combination of Persona's 2025 data breach, potential data sharing with 17 sub-processors, Peter Thiel connections, and Anthropic's prior privacy positioning makes this a values-level objection that rate limit adjustments cannot address (Anthropic to require government IDs).
Persistent API 500 Errors With Misleading Status Pages -- Medium Severity¶
Morning outages on April 16 continued the April 15 pattern. u/AustinLeungCK (6 upvotes): "it happened yesterday already... anthropic need to fix this shit rather than pushing their PR team." Status page reliability gap between consumer and government services (97.95% vs 99.96%) remains unaddressed (Claude code down?).
Cursor Account Bans and Platform Uncertainty -- Medium Severity¶
u/Agreeable_Idea5985 was banned from Cursor two days after paying $60 with no refund (53 score, 81 comments) (Banned from Cursor). u/captainnigmubba had a post asking "Is Cursor still worth it in 2026?" with 71 upvotes and 84 comments removed by moderators, then reposted the censorship (198 score, 91 comments) (Mods removed my post).
3. What People Wish Existed¶
Opus 4.5 Preservation or Model Version Pinning¶
u/Dyrect_ demonstrated that Opus 4.5 completes comparable work in half the tokens of Opus 4.6. Multiple users in the Opus 4.7 threads explicitly requested the ability to stay on older model versions. With Copilot phasing out 4.5 and 4.6, the demand for version pinning intensifies. "please don't do that anthropic" re: removing 4.5 access (use opus 4.5).
Opportunity rating: Direct. Demand confirmed quantitatively; extends April 15's model version selector request with new pricing urgency from the 7.5x Copilot multiplier.
Vendor-Agnostic Agent Configuration Standard¶
The CLAUDE.md vs AGENTS.md thread (636 score) exposes a fragmentation problem: Claude reads CLAUDE.md, Copilot reads different files, Codex has its own conventions. Developers maintaining multi-tool workflows need a single configuration format that all agents respect, or at minimum, a toolchain that generates per-agent configs from one source (How to properly deal with a CLAUDE.md file).
Opportunity rating: Competitive. The symlink/include workaround exists but is brittle; a proper standard would require industry coordination.
Independent Token Consumption Auditing¶
u/bitdamaged's A/B test methodology (pinning Claude Code versions, running identical prompts, comparing output tokens) is exactly the kind of tooling that should exist as a product. A service that continuously benchmarks token consumption across versions, models, and providers — detecting silent inflation — would serve both individual developers and enterprise procurement (GitHub issue #48808).
Opportunity rating: Direct. The methodology is proven; productization is straightforward.
4. Tools and Methods in Use¶
| Tool | Category | Sentiment | Strengths | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code (Opus 4.7) | AI Coding Agent | (+/-) | Stronger on difficult tasks per benchmarks; 3x vision resolution; same API pricing | Car wash reasoning failure; 1.0-1.35x token multiplier; burned Max x5 limits in 20 min; "nerfed" reports within hours |
| Claude Code (Opus 4.5) | AI Coding Agent | (+) | 2x more token-efficient than 4.6 in side-by-side tests; predictable behavior | 200K context window (vs 1M on 4.6/4.7); at risk of deprecation |
| Claude Code (Opus 4.6) | AI Coding Agent | (-) | Being replaced by 4.7 | Documented 3x output token inflation since v2.1.101; ~20K invisible tokens per request reported |
| GitHub Copilot (Opus 4.7) | IDE Agent | (-) | Available across all IDEs and CLI | 7.5x premium multiplier; 160K context cap; locked medium thinking; Opus 4.5/4.6 being phased out |
| Cursor (Opus 4.7) | IDE Agent | (+/-) | 50% launch discount | Max mode forced; high per-query token cost; account ban complaints |
| Google Antigravity | AI Coding Agent | (-) | Gemini 3.1 Pro for agentic use | Continued outages; Ultra plan users getting silent failures; thin-client architecture scaling issues |
| OpenAI Codex | AI Coding Agent | (+) | Consistent; catches issues Claude misses | Community discussion limited on April 16; overshadowed by Opus 4.7 launch |
u/Vast-Moose1393 provided a counterpoint (42 score, 162 comments): "this thing is still a multiplier to my work for almost every task" as a 15+ year senior engineer. u/puppymaster123 (8 upvotes) noted that SWEs managing teams of 12 with 2 Max accounts each report no "nerfing" complaints over the past 2 months — suggesting the quality variance may disproportionately affect less structured workflows (Whats with all the Claude hate?).
5. What People Are Building¶
| Project | Who built it | What it does | Problem it solves | Stack | Stage | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 67speed.com | u/East-Scale-1956 | Typing speed game revived by streamer community | Entertainment; grew to 4M players, 300M X views in 3 days | Vibe-coded (details not specified) | Shipped, viral | Post |
| Cross-Platform App Pipeline | u/Only-Season-2146 | Full Android + iOS app development and publishing workflow | Minimizing manual labor across mobile platforms | Gemini, React, Stitch, Claude Code, Vite, Capacitor, Firebase, RevenueCat, PlayFab, Suno, AntiGravity, Android Studio, CodeMagic | Shipped to both app stores | Post |
| 3D Periodic Table | u/NoSquirrel4840 | Interactive periodic table with 3D atom visualization | Chemistry education for nephew | React 19, Three.js, React Three Fiber, Zustand, Vite | Shipped | Post |
| Boring Cursor App | u/NotMeThenWhoSnaps | Undisclosed app that crossed 500+ users | Not specified | Cursor | Shipped (500+ users) | Post |
| Year-Guessing Daily Game | u/Fun_Associate_4203 | Daily game where players guess the year from real newspaper headlines | Entertainment / education | React, Claude API | Shipped | Post |
| SaaS ($1K MRR) | u/funfunfunzig | Undisclosed SaaS: $1K revenue, 50 paying customers, 2,000 signups in month 1 | Not specified | Vibe-coded | Shipped (paying customers) | Post |
| J.A.R.V.I.S. Coder Agent | u/True-Profile6435 | Free coding agent claimed to match Opus quality | Cost-free alternative to paid agents | Not specified | Shipped | Post |
| Retro Pixel Art React Library | u/Classic-Clothes3439 | 29 ready-to-use sections + 5 full page layouts in retro pixel art style | Copy-paste React UI components | React | Shipped (templates added) | Post |
u/East-Scale-1956's 67speed.com is the standout: a typing speed game originally built in November, revived by the streamer community to 300M views on X in 3 days. Growth hack: "$100 to get organic content creation going from actual users is way cheaper than any ad spend" (u/InteractionSmall6778, 5 upvotes). u/Only-Season-2146's 14-tool stack is the most detailed vibe coding workflow documentation in the dataset, covering the full path from Gemini prototype through Claude Code development to App Store submission.
6. New and Notable¶
Claude Opus 4.7 Released With Cyber Safeguards¶
Anthropic's official blog post positions Opus 4.7 as the first model to deploy safeguards from Project Glasswing, automatically detecting and blocking prohibited cybersecurity uses. A new Cyber Verification Program for legitimate security researchers launched alongside. Early-access testers report 13% lift on a 93-task coding benchmark over Opus 4.6, including four tasks neither Opus 4.6 nor Sonnet 4.6 could solve. Adaptive reasoning replaces configurable reasoning effort — there is no reasoning effort parameter anymore.
Grok Build Beta Announced¶
Elon Musk tweeted "Beta release of Grok Build app & terminal next week" (April 16, 2026). u/mauriciorubio shared the screenshot (58 score, 136 comments). u/Grouchy-Stranger-306 (108 upvotes): "nothingburger announcement." u/Powerful_Froyo8423 (62 upvotes): "Probably vibe coded something out of the leaked Claude Code code" (Grok Build is dropping next week).
Claude Code v2.1.101+ Output Token Regression Documented¶
u/bitdamaged filed GitHub issue #48808 with a reproducible A/B harness demonstrating output tokens per assistant message doubled at v2.1.98 and tripled at v2.1.101 on identical prompts. Session JSONLs are attached. The reporter also linked to caveman as a potential mitigation tool (As of 2.1.101 Output Tokens increased by 3x).
Claude Usage Intensity Data Point¶
u/Inside_Source_6544 shared Claude Code usage statistics: 920 sessions, 105,937 messages, 35.5M tokens consumed over 30 active days with a 31-day streak and 9 PM peak hour (106 score, 24 comments). "573x more tokens than The Great Gatsby" (More addictive than a social media app).
7. Where the Opportunities Are¶
[+++] Model version preservation and downgrade tooling — With Opus 4.5 demonstrably 2x more token-efficient than 4.6, and Copilot phasing out both 4.5 and 4.6 in favor of 7.5x-cost 4.7, users need the ability to pin to older model versions. Any provider that offers version pinning captures users fleeing forced upgrades. Evidence: u/Dyrect_'s side-by-side data, 7.5x multiplier outrage across 210 comments, and explicit "please don't remove 4.5" pleas.
[+++] Cross-provider token consumption auditing — u/bitdamaged's A/B testing methodology (pinned versions, identical prompts, JSONL comparison) proves that silent token inflation is real and measurable. A continuous monitoring service that tracks token-per-task across versions and providers — with alerts when consumption changes — would serve every paying AI coding user. Evidence: GitHub issue #48808 with full reproducer, 3x output token increase documented.
[++] Privacy-preserving AI coding access — The Persona Identities backlash (328 total comments, multiple cancellation threats) creates demand for AI coding tools that explicitly do not require identity verification or biometric data. Local LLM interest surged in these threads. A hosted service with strong privacy guarantees — or tooling that makes local models competitive for coding — captures the users drawing "a line in the sand." Evidence: three identity verification threads with explicit migration intent to local LLMs.
[++] Agent configuration interoperability layer — The CLAUDE.md vs AGENTS.md debate (636 score) reflects a deeper problem: each AI coding tool expects its own configuration format. A tool that maintains a single source of truth and generates per-agent configs (CLAUDE.md, .copilot-instructions.md, .cursorrules, etc.) would serve the growing multi-tool developer population. Evidence: symlink and include workarounds show demand; no proper solution exists.
[+] Independent AI service reliability dashboard — Status pages showing "Operational" during active outages have eroded trust across Claude, Copilot, and Antigravity. An independent, crowdsourced monitoring service tracking actual error rates, response times, and model quality across all major providers would serve both individual developers and enterprise buyers. Evidence: status page discrepancy documented in 5+ threads on April 16 alone.
8. Takeaways¶
-
Opus 4.7 launched and immediately failed the community's own reasoning benchmark — the "car wash test" — generating the day's highest-scoring post at 1746. The model's top-comment response (619 upvotes) predicts lobotomization within days. Regardless of Anthropic's benchmark improvements, the community evaluates models through reproducible common-sense tests, and Opus 4.7 failed on launch day. (Opus 4.7)
-
GitHub Copilot's 7.5x premium multiplier for Opus 4.7 — combined with phasing out Opus 4.5 and 4.6 — is being read as a forced price hike. The API pricing is unchanged, making the Copilot multiplier appear to be a margin decision. Users who relied on Opus 4.6 at 3x cost now face either 7.5x per request or switching to a different model entirely. (Claude Opus 4.7 is available in Copilot)
-
Reproducible A/B testing shows Claude Code output tokens tripled between versions 2.1.96 and 2.1.101 on identical prompts. This is the strongest quantitative evidence to date of silent token inflation — and it arrived the same day Anthropic announced Opus 4.7 uses even more thinking tokens. Users running older Claude Code versions are measurably more cost-efficient. (GitHub issue #48808)
-
The Persona Identities verification requirement generated the day's highest comment count (200) and explicit cancellation threats from long-time subscribers. The combination of Persona's 2025 data breach, Peter Thiel connections, and Anthropic's prior privacy positioning makes this a values-level objection that service improvements cannot address. (Anthropic to require government IDs)
-
The dominant community narrative is now "nerf-then-rebrand": degrade a model, release the original quality under a new version number, claim improvement. Whether or not this is accurate, it is the lens through which every Anthropic release will be evaluated going forward. u/anthsoul (155 upvotes): "They break your leg and then ask you to thank them for the crutches." (Be Anthropic)
-
Opus 4.5 is emerging as the pragmatic choice for cost-conscious developers. Side-by-side testing shows it completes comparable work in half the tokens of Opus 4.6, with more predictable behavior. The risk is imminent deprecation as providers consolidate around 4.7. (use opus 4.5)
-
Grok Build was announced as a beta for next week, and the community dismissed it immediately. The top comment (108 upvotes) called it a "nothingburger." Still, xAI entering the AI coding tool market adds a sixth major competitor alongside Claude Code, Copilot, Cursor, Codex, and Antigravity. (Grok Build is dropping next week)
-
The standout build is 67speed.com — a vibe-coded typing game that hit 300M views on X in 3 days after streamer revival, demonstrating that viral distribution remains the harder problem. "15 minutes to build and 4M players is the best vibe coding pitch anyone could make." (I built the most viral vibecoded site)